<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Outrider Search Blog &#187; APAC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.outrider.com.au/blog/tag/apac/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.outrider.com.au/blog</link>
	<description>Search news and related stories from Outrider Australia</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 22:15:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Google&#8217;s New Trademark Policy</title>
		<link>http://www.outrider.com.au/blog/googles-new-trademark-policy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.outrider.com.au/blog/googles-new-trademark-policy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 23:06:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robbie Hills</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[APAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brand protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paid Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.outrider.com.au/blog/?p=250</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ 
What does Google&#8217;s new trademark policy mean for companies in APAC?
Well it more than likely means increased search spend for you. No prizes why Google changed it then.
What was previously the case across the majority of APAC was that when you registered your trademark keyword terms with Google it meant your competitors, affiliates or [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="linkedin_share_container" style="float:right;margin:0px 0px 10px 10px"><a href="http://www.linkedin.com/shareArticle?mini=true&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.outrider.com.au%2Fblog%2Fgoogles-new-trademark-policy%2F&amp;title=Google%26%238217%3Bs+New+Trademark+Policy&amp;summary=What+does+Google%27s+new+trademark+policy+mean+for+companies+in+APAC%3F%0AWell+it+more+than+likely+means+increased+search+spend+for+you.+No+prizes+why+Google+changed+it+then.%0AWhat+was+previously+the+case+across+the+majority+of+APAC+was+that+when+you+registered+your+trademark+keyword+terms+with+Google+it+meant+your+competitors%2C+affiliates+or+unauthorized+%5B...%5D&amp;source=Outrider+Search+Blog" onclick="return popupLinkedInShare(this.href,'console',400,570)" class="linkedin_share_button"><img src="http://www.outrider.com.au/blog/wp-content/plugins/linkedin-share-button/buttons/03.png" alt="" /></a></div><div name="googleone_share_1" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><g:plusone size="tall" count="1" href="http://www.outrider.com.au/blog/googles-new-trademark-policy/"></g:plusone></div> 
<span class = "" style = "height: 80px;  float: right; "><iframe src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http://www.outrider.com.au/blog/googles-new-trademark-policy/&layout=box_count&send=false&show_faces=false&width=50&action=like&colorscheme=light&font=" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowTransparency="true" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width:50px; height:80px"></iframe></span><p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 10pt;">What does Google&#8217;s new trademark policy mean for companies in APAC?</p>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 10pt;">Well it more than likely means increased search spend for you. No prizes why Google changed it then.</p>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 10pt;">What was previously the case across the majority of APAC was that when you registered your trademark keyword terms with Google it meant your competitors, affiliates or unauthorized resellers could not buy those terms nor have an ad triggered against it.<span id="more-250"></span></p>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 10pt;">In a change which will take effect from June 4th 2009 your competitors or anyone else can add these previously &#8220;forbidden&#8221; keyword terms to their campaigns.  If your keyword terms have been registered with Google as being &#8220;trademarked&#8221; that term will <strong>NOT </strong>be allowed to be seen in the Ad Copy but the ad <strong>CAN BE</strong> shown.</p>
<p><strong>For Example:</strong></p>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 10pt;">Coke can buy the word Pepsi  and have a Coke Ad appear on Google as long as the keyword Pepsi is not shown in the Ad copy. (That is as long as Pepsi has registered its trademark keywords with Google)</p>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 10pt;">This is a major change. Australia and New Zealand is not affected at this stage.</p>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 10pt;">I am guessing because Google in the AU market has already been the subject of many legal and (recent) regulatory challenges and does not see the upside at this stage. China is another market that is missing from this recent policy change. Which, again, due to recent noise over market leader Baidu and its keyword and paid ad issues, I imagine Google has chosen discretion over revenue raising.</p>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 10pt;">A list of all 190 countries can be found here:</p>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 10pt;"><a href="http://adwords.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=144298">http://adwords.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=144298</a></p>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 10pt;">The main APAC countries affected are:</p>
<ul>
<li>India</li>
<li>Indonesia</li>
<li>Japan</li>
<li>Malaysia</li>
<li>Philippines</li>
<li>Singapore</li>
<li>Thailand</li>
</ul>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 10pt;">In a related Google policy change in the USA, there will be some instances where even though you are the owner of a registered trademark, Google will allow the ad to be shown and have the keyword appear in the Ad Copy. So much for brand protection!</p>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 10pt;"><strong>From Google&#8217;s site:</strong></p>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 10pt;">&#8220;We permit a trademarked term to be used in the ad text of ads that appear to be submitted by resellers; informational sites; the makers or resellers of components or parts for the goods and services related to the trademark term; or compatible components or parts for the goods and services related to the trademark term. The product or services from resellers must be on the ad&#8217;s landing page and must be clearly available for purchase.&#8221; (<a href="http://adwords.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=145407" target="_blank">Google Adwords Support</a>)</p>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 10pt;">This change will take effect from June 15th.</p>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 10pt;">All of these changes have been made under the guise of relevance for the user. Which I am sure is true, in part. However, it would be much more transparent and honest of Google if they just admitted it was to also increase advertising revenue at a time when they, like many around them, are under pressure to show continued revenue and profit increases.</p>
<p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 10pt;">Maybe they will in time when earnings come around again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.outrider.com.au/blog/googles-new-trademark-policy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

